- #404 NOT FOUND IP 91.189.91.13 80 HOW TO#
- #404 NOT FOUND IP 91.189.91.13 80 FULL#
- #404 NOT FOUND IP 91.189.91.13 80 PROFESSIONAL#
#404 NOT FOUND IP 91.189.91.13 80 HOW TO#
How to host many websites using same public IP address but different domains.I'm at a loss, thank you to anyone who can help. I've tried to use routing rules to get packets coming from Server2's public IP (which would be coming out of dev gre1) to go through dev eth0 on the public default gateway and that doesn't work either. However, I'm not seeing it go out at all on eth0:0 (where Server2's public IP is bound to). Tcpdump from Server2's GRE tunnel device:ġ2:07:17.029160 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags, proto ICMP (1), length 84) I can see the packet exiting the tunnel on Server2's gre1 device as shown:įrom Server1: ping -I This works great and I can see the packets arriving via GRE on Server2. Ip route add default via 10.0.0.2 dev gre1 table gre To do this, I setup virtual interfaces with Server2's public IPs on Server1 and then used routing rules on Server1 to route the packets through the GRE tunnel. I want to be able to bind to the public IPs on Server2 using Server1. I have 2 servers connected with a GRE tunnel. I'm pretty new to networking so please forgive any terminology mistakes. Obviously this is a messy solution and being able to fix this in the Cisco would be preferable. Ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.244 143 interface Dialer1 143 Ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.244 25 interface Dialer1 25 I bound a secondary ip address to mail server 192.168.1.244, changed the port forwards to use it while leaving all the local and IPSec traffic to use 192.168.1.241 and the problem was solved. Ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.241 143 interface Dialer1 143Īt the risk of answering my own question, I resolved this outside the Cisco realm. Ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.241 25 interface Dialer1 25 A route map is used to exclude the lans that are reachable via IPSec tunnels from being Nated. This is the strategic parts of the nat config. Is this a scenario anybody is familiar with and are there any suggestions on how to work around it? PPTP VPN traffic to the mail server is fine. It would seem that the modem with the port forwards is confusing traffic from the mail server destined for a machine on the other side of the IPSec VPN for traffic that should go back to a port forward connection. I recently added an IPSec VPN between the two modems and that works for every thing EXCEPT connections over the IPSec VPN to the mail server on port 25 or 143 from workstations on the remote lan. There are two DNS servers one inside the office which resolves mail to the local address, one outside the office which resolves mail for the rest of the world to the external interface. The modem doing the port forwarding also terminates PPTP VPN traffic. I have two port forwards on one of them for SMTP and IMAP from the outside to the inside this provides external access to the mail server. I have two Cisco ADSL modems configured conventionally to nat the inside traffic to the ISP. C# development with Mono and MonoDevelop.
#404 NOT FOUND IP 91.189.91.13 80 FULL#
How to get full query string parameters not UrlDecoded.Lots of first chance thrown when dealing with dynamics.
#404 NOT FOUND IP 91.189.91.13 80 PROFESSIONAL#
How To Start Your Own Professional Blog with WordPress.Fake ISAPI Handler to serve static files with extention that are rewritted by url rewriter.What are the advantages of Ceylon over Java?.Outlook add email account: requested operation failed.Best way for an external (remote) graphics designer to style ASP.NET MVC 4 app?.Set up two IP addresses with one gateway?.MVC4 App opens with directory listing and gives a 404 for any direct URL's entered in the browser.NET WebRequest.PreAuthenticate not quite what it sounds like Handling keyboard and mouse input (Win API).Why are perfectly legitamate pages on my website registering in google Webmasters as 404?.Axis Aligned Billboard: how to make the object look at camera.
0 kommentar(er)
